JRC digestate research: better fertiliser outlets to improve biomethane economics

The European Commission’s Joint Research Centre finds that certain processed digestates can replace part of the manufactured nitrogen fertiliser used by farmers. For biomethane producers, wider recognition could reduce the cost of finding agricultural outlets for digestate. The benefit depends on which materials qualify, whether nearby crops need the nutrients, and the cost of processing and application.[1]

16 Oct 2026 · Research published

The research does not change fertiliser limits.

19 Oct 2026 · Consultation opened

The Commission opened consultation on a proposal to extend existing RENURE rules to certain manure-derived liquid digestates. That expansion has not been adopted.[2]

Digestate is the material left after manure, crops or other organic feedstocks have been used to produce biogas. It retains nutrients that farmers can use to grow crops. For nitrogen, the important distinction is how readily plants can use it.

Organic nitrogen Delayed release

Bound within organic material. It must be broken down before crops can absorb it, making the timing of its release less predictable.

Mineral nitrogen Available to plants

Already in forms available to plants. “Mineral” describes its chemical form: this nitrogen can be present in digestate as well as manufactured fertiliser.

Digestion converts some organic nitrogen into mineral forms. Separating the digestate into liquid and solid fractions can then produce a liquid containing readily available nitrogen and relatively little organic material. This explanation is consistent with the JRC’s earlier SAFEMANURE assessment.[3]

1 · Feedstock → Manure, crops, other organics Nitrogen enters largely in organic form.
2 · Digestion → Biogas produced Some organic nitrogen is converted into mineral forms.
3 · Separation → Liquid Readily available nitrogen, relatively little organic material.
3 · Separation → Solids Phosphorus and organic matter concentrated.[7]
These processes change the form and distribution of nutrients; they do not create additional nitrogen.

The JRC highlights certain liquid fractions obtained through centrifugation, a process that separates material by spinning it. Fractions with high mineral nitrogen content and little carbon relative to nitrogen can deliver crop-fertilising performance similar to synthetic fertilisers.

The finding supports partial substitution of purchased fertiliser. It does not establish that every digestate, or every separated liquid fraction, will perform equally well.[4]

Digestate composition varies with the materials entering the digester, subsequent treatment and storage. Soil conditions and field management also affect its performance.

A plant therefore needs evidence about its own output. The label “liquid digestate” alone does not demonstrate consistent fertiliser quality or regulatory eligibility. The JRC calls for material-specific criteria and safeguards before broader recognition.[1]

The main risks are straightforward. The JRC consequently links wider use to suitable feedstocks, processing, storage and field application.[1][4]

Risk What it means Why it matters
Ammonia emissions Some nitrogen escapes into the air as gas during storage or spreading. Fertiliser value is lost and air pollution increases.
Nitrate leaching Nitrogen moves through the soil into water instead of being absorbed by crops. Application rates and timing must match crop needs.
Nutrient imbalance The material supplies more of a nutrient than the receiving land requires. Nitrogen demand alone cannot determine how much digestate should be spread.
Contaminants and pathogens Unwanted substances or disease-causing organisms may remain in the material. Nutrient content must be assessed alongside product safety.
A material can contain valuable nitrogen and still require restrictions on where, when and how it is used.

RENURE means “recovered nitrogen from manure”. It provides a route for qualifying processed manure products to replace manufactured nitrogen fertiliser beyond the ordinary manure allowance. Member States choose whether to authorise this route through national implementation.[5]

Nitrogen limits · kg N per hectare per year Weight of nitrogen, not of digestate
Regulatory ceilings
170 · STANDARD MANURE CEILING
+80 · RENURE
Example: nutrient plan leaves room for 40 kg N/ha of additional fertiliser
170 · MANURE
+40
40 ×
0 170 250
Manure nitrogen RENURE nitrogen applied × RENURE ceiling the nutrient plan does not justify
Standard manure ceiling 170 kg N/ha/yr

Limits nitrogen applied through livestock manure, including processed manure, where the relevant Nitrates Directive action programme applies.

Separate RENURE allowance Up to 80 kg N/ha/yr

Allows additional nitrogen from qualifying recovered products, subject to national authorisation and safeguards.

The rules apply in nitrate-vulnerable zones, or across a country where its government applies the action programme nationally.

The combined figures do not establish a general entitlement to apply 250 kg of nitrogen. Fertilisation must still comply with crop requirements and other restrictions. For example, if a farm’s nutrient plan leaves room for only 40 kg N/ha of additional fertiliser, the 80 kg RENURE ceiling does not justify applying the full amount.[6]

The proposed expansion concerns additional eligible products

Existing rules under Commission Directive (EU) 2026/288 recognise three specified outputs. Selected centrifuged liquid digestates are the focus of the proposed expansion. Under current rules, suitable nitrogen composition alone does not place them within the recognised list of production outputs.[6]

Ammonium scrubbing salts Recognised · 2026/288
Mineral concentrates produced through reverse osmosis Recognised · 2026/288
Manure-derived struvite Recognised · 2026/288
Selected centrifuged liquid digestates Proposed · not adopted

The clearest opportunity is for manure-based plants supplying farms that have reached the manure-nitrogen ceiling but still need nitrogen for their crops. Qualifying liquid digestate could replace fertiliser those farms currently purchase.

At manure ceiling · crops need N Shorter transport distances or lower charges for taking digestate away.
Local nutrient needs already met Broader eligibility would provide little additional outlet capacity.

This is a commercial inference from the proposed substitution mechanism.[2]

Recognition of qualifying centrifuged liquids could give some plants an alternative to further nitrogen-recovery treatment. However, centrifugation itself adds equipment and electricity costs; the EU CAP Network reports higher costs and energy demand than screw pressing.[7]

+avoided transport and outlet costs +any fertiliser receipts −processing, testing, storage and application costs =relevant calculation per plant

The published JRC summary provides no standard saving per plant.

Separation generally leaves more readily available nitrogen in the liquid and concentrates phosphorus and organic matter in the solids (see the separation step in 01).[7]

A better outlet for the liquid therefore does not solve the whole digestate problem. Plants must retain a compliant outlet for the solids. Where surrounding soils already contain excessive phosphorus, transporting those solids elsewhere may remain necessary.

The 19 October proposal faces a one-month feedback period, followed by a required qualified-majority endorsement in the Nitrates Committee and three months of European Parliament and Council scrutiny before possible adoption.[2]

  1. 16 Oct 2026 JRC research published. Fertiliser limits unchanged.
  2. 19 Oct 2026 · Now Commission proposal; consultation opens. One-month feedback period.
  3. Not scheduled Nitrates Committee. Qualified-majority endorsement required.
  4. Three months European Parliament and Council scrutiny, then possible adoption.
  5. Spring 2027 Commission ambition to provide practical solutions. A target, not a confirmed application date.
  6. Member States National implementation. Each Member State chooses whether to authorise the RENURE route.
06 — Verdict

For project appraisals, lower digestate-management costs should remain conditional.

Savings should not be assumed until three things are established.

01 Final product criteria
02 Applicable national permissions
03 Receiving-farm capacity